Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bytro Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:58, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bytro Labs[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a subsidiary of the Stillfront Group, sourced to a routine listing, a primary source and a product announcement. The article has twice been moved from Draft into mainspace by WP:SPA WP:COI editor Max Bytro whose other edits concerned one of the firm's products, deleted at AfD in June. Searches are not finding the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 11:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like we're missing an article on the parent organization (Stillfront Group), into which a number of articles might more reasonably be organized rather than as separate articles. I see a few routine hits for this particular developer that might reasonably live there as it exists. --Izno (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I did consider the alternative possibility of creating Stillfront Group and replacing this and other subsidiary articles with redirects, but, though Stillfront Group AB is listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, my searches were not finding sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH, in my opinion. AllyD (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - just not notable by itself, no reliable sources. If somebody created a reasonable article for the parent, I might recommend merging it into that article. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 23:31, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:Corp, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.