Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bytemobile
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 01:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bytemobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertising Corvus cornixtalk 05:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nomination. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am the author and not sure why this is being suggested for deletion. The page is not an advertisement, simply general information about the company. If there is something specific that I am in violation of, or that should be altered, I'm happy to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobile Generation (talk • contribs) 18:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am the author, and have gone through and modified again to be sure that any possible "ad verbiage" has been removed. Can you please remove our listing from the "articles for deletion" category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobile Generation (talk • contribs) 17:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. References listed on the article are mostly from the corporate web page or are press releases - these don't convey as reliable sources. A quick Google search doesn't turn up anything interesting except for a quick blurb or three - mostly press releases. This said, we're not a repository for corporate information - this is what a corporate web page is for. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. References are to press releases, top 100 lists, and the like. Vague PR-style description of back-office software: provides network capacity management software for operators of mobile networks delivering multimedia services to their subscribers. No showing that this product has had significant impacts on history, culture, or technology. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am the author, thank you very much for your comments. We are currently working on updating the content that will fall better in line the your guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobile Generation (talk • contribs) 21:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.