Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bynder (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bynder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP. The Deloitte award may be notable, but the source is primary and Deloitte isn't an independent news organization - I wouldn't be surprised if they had some sort of skin the game when it comes to the success of Bynder (please, prove me otherwise). Outside of the aware I don't really see anything of significant notability here. Comatmebro (talk) 20:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see anything that passes WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 15:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete minor coverage and no articles link to this. LibStar (talk) 08:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete provided sources are just everyday PR coverage which don't help to show notability. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.