Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buyology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to say what happens to many small companies, just like this situation, the articles are deleted as “Spam” because they have not yet gained notoriety. This is not to be taken as a negative to the company or the individual writing the article. However, there is a misconception that Wikipedia can and should be used as a directory (or as we call it State side: Yellow Pages) or a listing of companies. Sometimes we forget that the Wikipedia project is supposedly an encyclopedia providing a research tool for individuals to explore “Note” worthy items that are not widely known outside there small area or are widely known, but the individual would like additional information. All-in-all, I believe the article will be deleted. However, as I stated earlier, please do not take this as a derogatory statement to you as the author or the company you are writing about. It is just a state of affairs that I believe is not a good fit for Wikipedia at this time.Shoessss 17:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- del. notability not stablished. wikipedia not yellow pages nor who is who. `'mikka 18:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete CSD G11 Thewinchester (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.