Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buy n Large (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and recreate as redirect to WALL-E. Nousernamesleft (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buy n Large[edit]

Non-notable fictitious company; entirely in-universe information; not enough reliable non-trivial 3rd party sources to establish notability independently of the film WALL-E. Chardish (talk) 02:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Previous afd resulted in a redirect to WALL-E which was apparently undone at some point. I can't imagine this being anything besides an in-universe plot summary, just a minor aspect of the film. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this, per nom and Hammer, again. Cliff smith ^talk 02:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although at some point there could be interest in the failed viral marketing campaign surrounding BnL, currently should just go back to a redirect. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 03:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then redirect to WALL-E per nom and all above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.