Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buttprune
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per SNOW, neologism Rodhullandemu 23:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Buttprune[edit]
- Buttprune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined prod. Made-up term sourced to urbandictionary.com. 28bytes (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yeah, urbandictionary is one thing that's never a reliable source. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable source. Tarheel95 (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Less than ten Ghits, and only five are about the subject (four of which are Urban Dictionary). Get on your winter coats, people. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Gross. Not even worth explaining. Suffice to say that this should be wiped out. Mandsford 21:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can we speedy this? --Pontificalibus (talk) 23:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.