Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business vacation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Bduke (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Business vacation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism Ged UK (talk) 07:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms and lack of reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:N & WP:V, which if used in a sentence: Your made up term has failed to meet the minimum requirements of the notability and verification policies of this website. LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a joke book. Jll (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As written it's just a dicdef of a neologism. I'm not saying it would be impossible to create an article about junkets, the real term for this (their origin, history, legality, cultural significance, prevalence, economic impact, etc), just that there's none of that in the article. At this point no content worth saving I'm afraid. Wikidemo (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.