Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business place
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Business place (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some sort of essay/how-to article and/or WP:NEO — Timneu22 · talk 14:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. For future reference, you could have used WP:PROD for this, as it's a pretty obvious case: no sources, no explanation, no evidence of notability, reads like something copied out-of-context from a textbook. I would say speedy delete, but it doesn't quite fit any of the criteria, though it comes close to criterion A1 (no context). WaltonOne 16:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Very difficult to maintain a bunch of PRODs, as I see hundreds of pages per hour. PROD gets removed and the article just falls by the wayside. Parts of this are written in an essay style, and I've begged WT:CSD for an essay reason, but they refuse. — Timneu22 · talk 16:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In browsing usage in Google scholar, the term "business place" seems more to be used for brick and mortar facilities than for online ones. I found no specific usage as a "term of art" above and beyond its plain meaning, whether applied to a physical or virtual "place". --Bejnar (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.