Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business delegate pattern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. As a copyright violation, which seems to be uncontested. Sandstein 21:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Business delegate pattern[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not appear to be an encyclopedia article; in fact it is more or less a simple copy of the resource used for the reference: [1]. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Content is unencyclopedic. Meatsgains (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 21:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a copyright violation (it probably should have a speedy delete tag). Even if inspection showed a copyvio defense, we don't host pages that are essentially taken from elsewhere. If notability can be shown, someone can recreate an encyclopedic article (without source code) like those in the current "See also". Johnuniq (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems to be part of a series of articles on an aspect of software. Even if problematic on its own, it needs to be considered in context, so no delete until then I suggest. It does need work though. Aoziwe (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi guys, the main resource for the article is Oracle docs because that pattern belongs to them basically and currently. So, I had to use that as a main resource, and a few other resouces. Guy, do you have any idean about what a design pattern is? mmmm, for the copyvio thing, just improve the article by providing a simplied version if it is possible. You guys are not much helping the community much as I believe, just criticizing others much. And, it might be important to include source code while describing a pattern. Oh dear dear, please refer the technical stuff more. Anyway, I cannot waste much time on creating articles. Why don't you guys, create or improve articles instead of criticizing to get the community attention, and just always following someone else's passimistic arguments as a pattern. best luck you all. Shevonsilva (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
what a joke? delegation pattern can be an article, but business delegate pattern cannot be. ha ha ha. wastage of my time too. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, guys, I found another link for business delegate pattern, that is https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Delegate. Why do you guys stop growing of wikipedia??? (if something is wrong, improve it instead of deleting) Shevonsilva (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.