Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bury Me At Make-Out Creek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Killing Tree. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bury Me At Make-Out Creek[edit]
- Bury Me At Make-Out Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:NALBUMS. Did not chart. No charting singles. Not a representative of the genre. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google News provided nothing and Google Books provided one result here but the preview won't appear properly, however, it is probably insignificant. SwisterTwister talk 04:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This album (it's a demo actually) was recently reissued in here, and also it's on iTunes - here. Not very significant, still, it did exist and I think that at least iT is a reliable source.Filas312 (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment source is not the issue. Notability is. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:06, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If the final decision is delete, perhaps a merge of the content into the band's article would be of use. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. "It exists" is not a valid reason to keep. Sideways713 (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.