Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnivore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Burnivore[edit]
It is believed that this article constitutes original research. John254 02:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless reliable references are given. Victao lopes (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom and per WP:NEO , unlikely to be referenced [1] Cenarium (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, even google has barely heard of it. Neo neologism! Travellingcari (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: self-promotion of original research and neologism.--Curtis Clark (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm a Deletivore. I consume 175 times my own weight in WP:NEO articles daily. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Good one. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Munch, munch. Tastes like...chicken. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mmmmmm...tasty. Kakofonous (talk) 04:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NEO — X S G 04:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 05:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An essay-style article about an unknown neologism? Snowball, anyone? --Ig8887 (talk) 07:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even ignoring the conflict of interest, it's an unknown neologism. GBT/C 10:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete To quote the article's own references section: "Burnivore is a new word and no refferences can be found. ... we are trying to create a new word". To quote WP:NOT#OR: "Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day". --Sturm 21:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We are trying to create a new Delete. *rolleyes* JuJube (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A newly proposed popular word?! Delete this! vıdıoman 12:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How else do you expect unsourced, unreferenced neologisms to florish in the 21st Century? I'll give the guy credit for creativity, but delete this and all this user's other contributions as OR. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: Everything tastes like chicken, you know. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.