Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burning Inside (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Inside[edit]

Burning Inside (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American death metal band. I have just found out that this article has been deleted back in 2005, on the ground that the article only contained the word "yo". But since then the article has been re-created, this time about the band itself. Anyhow, I think they are not notable. The article is also poorly sourced to an Allmusic biography and the band's official site. While the former provides some notability to this group, the latter does not, obviously. The articles on their albums are also up for deletion because they are not notable either. I did a Google search on both the band and the albums. Since this group shares the name with the Ministry song, it was difficult to search for it because most of the results are about this song, the rest of the results are either about other metal bands which have "burning" and "inside" in their names, or, just like in the case of other non-notable bands, are stuff which contain these two words but that's it. The coverage about THIS band is very scarce, the results were the following: unreliable databases, streaming service links, the aforementioned Allmusic biography, an interview and basically that's it. Most of the "sources" that are actually about this band copy the Allmusic biography. I also searched for the albums but nothing reliable came up besides the unreliable databases, retail sites, fan pages and blogs. This seems like an obscure, underground metal band which has made no waves whatsoever, and to be frank I have never heard about them or their members (with the exception of Richard Christy) but that's not the point here. So with all this being said, I don't think they are notable so I put them up for deletion. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with the rationale for the nomination, it's impossible to find anything substantial about the band. They are not notable.JohnmgKing (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: if a band article is nominated at AfD there's no need to separately nominate their album pages unless they have some claim of notability such as charting or multiple reliable reviews. This is because if the band article is deleted then their album pages can be speedy deleted as A9 as per WP:CSD, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.