Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burmese respelling of the English alphabet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Burmese respelling of the English alphabet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't understand if this article is right for English Wiki Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's no reason not to discuss this topic in an English-language encyclopedia; en.wiki is for human knowledge written in English, not just matters of parochial interest in the US, the UK, etc. The article is under-sourced at the moment, but loanwords are a thing that linguists study [1][2], and perhaps the referencing could be improved. XOR'easter (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Entire reasoning for the AFD is flawed. English Wikipedia covers anything that passes GNG. And this topic seems like something that should pass GNG if effort was put into improving its sourcing. An article being in poor shape is not reason for deletion.★Trekker (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree with above, interesting article and no real reason for deletion mentioned. Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.