Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burger King Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Burger King advertising#Children's advertising. Daniel (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burger King Kingdom[edit]

Burger King Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the WP:GNG. At current there are two passing mentions that get us around two sentences of coverage -- one to say it existed, and one to say it stopped soon after. Jontesta (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge then redirect. This article is improperly defined as 'a fictional universe'. What it really is (should be...) about is the marketing campaign from the 70s/80s. Anyway, I see a few passing mention in books and one academic paper [1] but no in-depth coverage. I can't find it mentioned in the Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns although this source is not well digitized. As such, it seems this fails the GNG. But I'd support merging and redirecting (soft deletion) this into the Burger King article. To be precise, what can be resouced is the first (referenced) part of history, plus I'd also merge the mention of the lead character, The Burger King (who has his own stand-alone article right now and is also mentioned in passing by some sources I see). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Possibility of a redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 00:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.