Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burak Arıkan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. no arguments for deletion MINUS the nom JForget 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Burak Arıkan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No evidence of notability. no independent sources cited, and searching has produced blogs, social networking sites, promotional sites, but no significant independent coverage in reliable sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. His art has received enough attention in international news media [1] [2] [3] that I think he passes WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Also this [4]. There's enough coverage to establish notabilty. -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein and Whpq. --Lambiam 20:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.