Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunnu K. Endo Maye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bunnu K. Endo Maye[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFO. The only point of notability is that its director won an award for some other film. Daiyusha (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An increased level of notability of the director has been incorporated into the article. The director has won the Best INdian film for one of his feature film in a major international film Festival and the Swarna Kamal Award at the Indian National Film Awards, the highest awards given by the Indian government in India. These points have now been incorporated into the article with references.Puppett (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTINHERITED.∯WBG^converse 07:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-- I see trivial coverage in local RS. Fails WP:NFILM. ∯WBG^converse 07:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is the existence of a third party review of the film on an elite film review portal Upperstall. The film is also on IMDB. Guddi1111 (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not a reliable source, WP:NFO states there should be reviews from 2 nationally known critics, I doubt Upperstall is a reliable and "nationally" known site. Daiyusha (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some of the "sources" do not appear to even be about this film, others are IMDB. This all looks very trivial.Slatersteven (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.