Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bumpits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru 00:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bumpits[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. Existence is not notability. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia does not offer free advertising space. SteveStrummer (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. --OpenFuture (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Product has been covered in multiple reliable sources. Featured in a local Fresno newspaper article, reviewed in the UK Daily Mail, and company's tribulations with the better business bureau reported on along with a bunch of minor reviews such as [1], [2], [3]. -- Whpq (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: although my first reaction was never ever, the given refs. indicate some kind of notability. Dewritech 06:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dewritech (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Product review links don't make it notable. Maybe if in a few years this product gains widespread use, article can be recreated. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why wouldn't product reviews make it notable? Book reviews are used to establish notability of books. Product reviews are evidence that the product is being noted. The reviews are both independent and reliable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just about every product gets reviewed somewhere. But that doesn't mean the product will become popular or noteworthy. It could just fade away into obscurity after the review. So product reviews don't make it notable but a proven track record will. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - The articles are geographically diverse, and they span from 2008 to 2010. How will you judge a "proven track record"? -- Whpq (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. There is some coverage but it's a borderline situation. Favour deletion as the coverage isn't quite substantial enough. (Even if it's deleted it may become notable enough in the future.) Christopher Connor (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.