Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bukunmi Oluwasina (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bukunmi Oluwasina[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor References, Failed to Pass WP:GNG. None of the sources are independent. No lead role. Jimandjam (talk) 11:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Artists. Jimandjam (talk) 11:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is sourced from reliable sources according to the list on WP:NGRS.So,all these references used on the article are not poor according to WP:NGRS. Aderiqueza (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This biography of an actress should not be judged because it was once nominated for deletion and got deleted when it was created by another user years ago.It should be critically checked and the nomination should not be biased. Aderiqueza (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Fellow Wikipedians, I had intended not to comment on or persuade any of the decisions of the AfD opened on any of the articles started during the #AfroCreativesWiki project because we had intensively trained the participants and I don't want the standards that has made Wikipedia what it is to be bent.
This article was created as a part of an ongoing #AfroCreativesWiki edit-a-thon (where I happen to be Wikipedian in Residence) and I chimed in to say two things.
- The topic has been nominated for significant awards (however they are for works that have not been significant enough to make it to Wikipedia)
- The reincarnation of this article may not be much different than it was when it was deleted 2 years ago. It is left to the discretion of this discussion keep or delete it.
- Because the editor is new, we might rather move the article to draft rather than delete.
Whatever the outcome, it will be taken as a lesson for other participants.

Thank you. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources in the article appear to support WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO notability. She has won and been nominated for notable awards, and there are independent and reliable sources that offer depth about her and her career, e.g. BBC (2020), Legit (2020). Beccaynr (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to meet WP:GNG. As per WP:BEFORE, sources beyond those currently on the article at the time of nomination should be considered. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:BASIC. Article has been nicely improved since nomination, and contains multiple sources that describe her in enough detail that are listed at WP:NGRS. Femke (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.