Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buket Uzuner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buket Uzuner[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of an author that doesn't seem to meet notability criteria. Sources are either promotional or links to personal websites. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easily passes NAUTHOR. Uzuner is taught at Turkish schools, and her work is analyzed in scholarship such as: [1], [2], [3].--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 13:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. For "an author that doesn't seem to meet notability criteria" there are a surprising number of papers about her work on Google scholar. I don't read Turkish, so can't evaluate them individually, but unless someone who can explains why they should be discounted, I presume she's notable. pburka (talk) 14:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has major issues but it seems that the subject is notable. The page can be kept in my opinion. Keivan.f^Talk 22:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Especially as the subject has received wide coverage. NavjotSR (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I would like to herein rescind the nomination of said article for deletion. My bad on missing out some notable references that clearly establish notability. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.