Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BugBox (software) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Shimeru 08:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BugBox (software)[edit]
- BugBox (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Advert for non-notable software. Survived a previous VFD but the standards have changed since then while the article has not. MER-C 11:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - all revisions of this article appear to be a copyright violation with the initial revision taken from http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Topic:PRINCE2_Software and then new material added from the same source. Or what is more likely, both this article and the ittoolbox entry were copied from internal promotional material. The article does not meet the WP:CORP recommendations for products and services or establish notability with respect to the WP:SOFTWARE criteria, citing multiple independent reliable sources. There is substantial evidence that the main contributors to this article are editing with a conflict of interest. Aside from entries made as part of these conflict of interest edits, no article links here, so in that sense there is no demand for the article. ✤ JonHarder talk 13:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless the references for the software can be satisified. --Sigma 7 14:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Software is notable according to example on Wikipedia software guidelines page: PC Tools satisfies this criterion [software notability] because it was the subject of a full-length magazine review in the October 1991 edition of Compute!. BugBox software has independent review published on official APM Group website.Stevo 12:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)StephenAshurst[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.