Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bueno Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a "run of the mill" company that does not appear not pass the general guidelines and WP:CORPDEPTH tests. Shirt58 (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tend to agree. It's a fairly obvious COI with promotional intent, and I didn't speedy it only because of the "award-winning" claim. Deb (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep although perhaps a weakish one. Yes the article has been created by an SPA, probably COI, and initial intention was probably promotional, and my first impulse was delete. However, on searching there is I suggest just sufficient WP:NEXIST of sufficiently independent sources, even if "within the industry", to get this over the WP:GNG line. There are some I think to allow more depth to be added to the article too, including security bugs in their software. COI is not a problem as long as the article has a balanced NPOV presentation. Aoziwe (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete boring directory entry. Fails WP:NCORP. Jytdog (talk) 00:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article describing a recent new company. The industry awards for the firm and its CEO do not appear notable in their own right and I am seeing nothing to indicate this to be more than a firm going about its business; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, subtle WP:ARTSPAM. A sentence like "claiming to fill a major gap in building operational intelligence in Australia" is lifted off http://www.airmaster.com.au/projecthaystack/: " filling a major gap in building operational intelligence in Australia", the Services section is predictably sounding like a rewrite of an About page, awards are non-notable, and sources are week. Fails WP:NCORP/WP:GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 18:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.