Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buck Twenty
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 16:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
dicdef at best, neologism and/or unverifiable OR at worst (unless someone provides some context and verifiable sources, in which case it just becomes a dicdef). Tonywalton | Talk 23:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Xyzzyplugh 00:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as complete bollocks -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As author of this article, deletion is probably warranted at this time ... I intended to expand upon this article, but unfortunately lack the time. I have also looked for information on this word / phrase through the internet and have found no sources ... however, this is slang that is used frequently in my work place.
- Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day -- Krash 18:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unverifiable random stuff. In fact, can we speedy this as author request? Stifle 00:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.