Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bsous Silk Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn in light of sources found. LibStar (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bsous Silk Museum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. 1 hit in gnews. unless something can be found in Arabic it should go. LibStar (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep . Don't know what search engine you are using but the silk museum of Bsous appears to be notable. Sources such as this and this clearly indicate notability. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 16:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

look at the link I provided, I used google news. LibStar (talk) 06:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here are some sources in Arabic: [1][2] (translated w Google Translate) and one more source in English[3]. The museum's official website looks pretty official FWIW. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the ghits found by Himalayan and Calliopejen1. Warrah (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Besides the sources listed here, its also mentioned in the book Tourism in the Middle East: continuity, change, and transformation (2007) . The English-language Lebanese newspaper The Daily Star discusses it (Bsous museum highlights Lebanon's history as major silk producer). So too does the "BestinLebanon" tourism site [4]. These sources were found after a five minute google search. Perhaps the nominator might have done a bit more homework before proposing deletion? Tiamut^talk 18:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - appears notable, with sources in the article, and additional ones provided here (they should be added to the article) Tzu Zha Men (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.