Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Hogan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Hogan[edit]

Unreferenced BLP. Nothing in Ghits supports it. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 13:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G10 and WP:BLP. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 15:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone must have edited the page in the meantime, because I don't see anything disparaging in there. - Mgm|^(talk) 15:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There has been no edits to the article since its nomination. I had initially tagged the article for speedy A7, but I reverted my own tag after the article was expanded enough to assert notability. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Google search designed to ignore hits on another Bryan Hogan returns nothing of substance. Conscious that including the city might return false negatives, I tried this search key, which returned only the Wikipedia article. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The assertions of notability don't even include enough detail to make any judgements--WHERE did he play those parts he claims? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm afraid I must disagree with Blanchard in that I see no assertion of notability. I must lament the lack of sourcing. If WP:RS had been presented in the article, the question of notability would be easier to determine. There is no BLP issue as BLP was intended to to address abuse of the pedia through defamation or promotion. There is not even enough content for that. Simple, straight forward not meeting WP:BIO. Dlohcierekim 15:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I did see one notability assertion, and that's why I felt I had to remove my own speedy tag. The problem is, as you say, there are no sources to back it up. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.