Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutal Attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 08:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brutal Attack[edit]

I did look, but outside of some white-supremacist sites, I'm not finding the sources that would verify notability for this band. FisherQueen (Talk) 16:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to fit notability criterias. Tazmaniacs 16:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note. while this article has been speedy-deleted three times before, its content on each of those three occasions was either a nanostub or just plain insults, so those deletions don't indicate a CSD trajectory for this (clearly nontrivial) version of the article. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 16:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No vote. It's clear that this group is controversial, and seems to be better known for their politics than their music (including mentions by the ADL [1] and SPLC [2]). So I'd contend that the notability of the band is as much a function of their political fame/infamy as of WP:MUSIC criteria. I don't know enough about extremist music to express an informed opinion. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 16:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough. Other than the fact they are white supremecists, I don't see any difference between them and some band that plays in a club. Malamockq 21:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No valid assertion of notability. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 16:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.