Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Venture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Venture[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No notable contributions to the genre. Award categories of "Best Male Newcomer", "New stud" etc. are not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not pass PORNBIO. Lacks significant reliable source coverage needed to pass GNG. Gets most of his coverage from being in a video clicked on by Ted Cruz. Even then, he gets only incidental coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GNG & all that shizz. –Davey2010^Talk 02:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO. No significant reliable source coverage to pass GNG. Finnegas (talk) 08:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete our coverage of performers in pornography is a clear case of no attention to following the GNG in any way.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage in reliable sources Atlantic306 (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.