Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Notley-Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Notley-Smith

Non-notable Local Government Politician Sambauers (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Sambauers (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While there is scope for mayors to be notable under WP:POLITICIAN, there is little content here, either references or achievements, to suggest any sustainable notability. WWGB (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mayor of a city of 125,000 seems notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT A city of 125,000 is definitely notable. Being the mayor of such a city is not inherently notable. To qualify for an article in Wikipedia, the mayor needs to be notable in his own way. Mayors come and go, and Wikipedia would have a lot of articles about former-mayors if the mayoral robes were sufficient to achieve notability. Dolphin51 (talk) 05:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails to establish that the subject is notable in accordance with the criteria specified in WP:BIO Dolphin51 (talk) 05:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neither being mayor, or owning a cleaning business, is inherently notable. Everything else I can find appears trivial. Nuttah (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.