Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce King Hallock
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce King Hallock[edit]
- Bruce King Hallock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't confirm notability Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The substance of the article is identical to its one source: see the Talk page for discussion of its uncertain Copyvio position. AllyD (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Effectively the article says that the subject worked in aviation. If there is any claim to notability it is in building his "Road Wing"; I don't think that is sufficient though. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. AllyD (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No references, and according to this aircraft enthusiast who read a grandson's biography, Hallock's designs were "just run of the mill constant chord swept 'wings with tip fins". Clarityfiend (talk) 03:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. EricSerge (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.