Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Carter (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Conditional on the article being cleaned up; I see that some edits to that effect took place after the start of the AfD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Carter (businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article has contacted Oversight requesting deletion, citing incorrect and outdated information plus recent defamatory vandalism. I have suppressed several potentially defamatory edits. Per WP:BLPDELETE we should try to honor these requests when we can. Katie^talk 11:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I wish to advocate to Keep the page. Amendments could be made to correct the currency of the information it contains. As the lead says, Carter has been listed as one of the most influential people in South Australia by the state's leading newspaper. I can also assist with the expansion and improvement of this article. --Danimations (talk) 23:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep? If we have the choice to keep it, now that it has been cleaned up(?), why delete it. If it gets repeatedly attacked again, then yes delete it to protect the LP. Aoziwe (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is well sourced but rephrasing is necessary as per WP:BIO @ Aoziwe,Danimations. Genome$100 (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.