Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrowseControl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 22:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BrowseControl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to Notability (organizations and companies)

"If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."

Beyond that, the article has been primarily created and maintained by the producers of this software. In addition, the company itself is not notable enough to merit its own Wikipedia article... otherwise I would suggest merging the article into the broader company article.ReformedArsenal (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it is not notable, and a quick search through Google, didn't turn up many/any notable results. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.