Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother Andrew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant ^talk 16:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Andrew[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable third-party sources as required by WP:BLP. Bleakcomb (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...if you want to add the missing sources, the G-News archives might be helpful (it is a search for subject's nickname, God's Smuggler). Brother Andrew is a notable person and we should keep and improve this article. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep – I was able to find articles about Brother Andrew in both the New York Times, as shown here [1] and Time as shown here [2]. There are a few more references from other 3rd party publications. Is this enough to keep, just not sure? I’ll add better sourcing to the article and we’ll find out what consensus is. Thanks ShoesssS ^Talk 16:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on the good work above. Seems notable, only the sources are really in qustion so with sourcing should be a keep. MLA (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep consider also the RS coverage under Open Doors which often includes mentions of its founder. Jclemens (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.