Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Chase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Chase

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Porn performer BLP with no independent reliable sourcing nd no legitimate assertion of notability. PROD removed by article creator, who then added claims that were not at all supported by the cited sources (in one case contradicted by), and which made no more than negligible contributions to notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete the article because violated WP:RS.Forest90 (talk) 01:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Delete for complete lack of independent reliable source coverage. Fails both WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. Porn award wins would not even satisfy the now-superceeded WP:PORNBIO SNG. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A review of the findsources finds that she fails the GNG and I could find no evidence that would support the criteria under WP:ENT. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft, to see whether this can be improved. The subject, beyond her primary career, apparently was also reported on for an attempt at stand-up comedy. If it is not improved, it will ultimately be deleted as abandoned. I wouldn't keep this in mainspace, though. Most news hits I get for "Brooklyn Chase" refer either to police chases in Brooklyn or Chase Bank locations in Brooklyn. bd2412 T 19:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The NJ Stage source is an announcement for a show, in which Brooklyn Chase is briefly mentioned as one of the performers. It lacks depth, and its independence as a secondary source is questionable. My assessment for failing WP:ENT takes this into account due to lack of substantial RS coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.