Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Monk

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 March 31.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Monk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article asserts that Ms Monk has "more than 419 million likes and nearly 8 million followers on TikTok". I have done the required due diligence and have found no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent that supports that assertion. I my opinion this article also meet the related the Template:Db-web speedy deletion as "an article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There appears to be no extensive coverage of this person.★Trekker (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If she is popular enough her name could have been included in the List of most-followed TikTok accounts. The subject is WP:TOOSOON and isn't a notable TikToker compared to Charli D'Amelio. Abishe (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable 17-year-old.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Every Youtuber has a Social Blade account, and their YouTube channel is absolutely unreliable. Neither of the sources are reliable for this article. I even tried searching her name up, but nothing appeared besides her own social media accounts. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate) 20:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couldn’t find much coverage for her work, fails notability. Nika2020 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as it is not seeing how this notable.--Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 20:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.