Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Ballentyne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Ballentyne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails ENT and GNG and awards without sources no longer are enough. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:ENT and WP:BASIC. No reliably sourced biographical content. No non-trivial RS coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.