Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Rites

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Rites[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability. Sources mostly don't mention Broken Rites. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think the coverage here is more than incidental; it amounts to significant per WP:ORG and WP:GNG. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Weak article, very notable organisation - pretty much turned the Catholic Church on its head in at least two Australian states over the issue of sex abuse by clergy, and have been quite public during the recent and ongoing debates about child migrants. See e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], (a possibly useful one) as examples (these are randoms - I can do a factiva search for anyone who wants to work on this article - if anyone wishes to take me up on that, contact me on my talk page). Orderinchaos 03:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability has been clearly demonstrated above. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.