Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broden Borg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 03:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broden Borg[edit]

This is an article about a local government politician with no obvious notability Grahame (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mattinbgn. The Melton Shire council is not notable enough for an article, and this council member is definitely not notable enough. Graymornings_(talk) 04:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:POLITICIAN as a member of a small local council. Nothing on google suggests anything notable. Valenciano (talk) 08:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Graymornings - being a member of a non-notable council is not in itself enough to confer notability. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 13:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN. — neuro^(talk) 03:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.