Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney Spears doll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Tim Song (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears doll[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is just a list of Spears' dolls, all of them, unreferenced. This article lacks of relevance, and the fact that there are no references to this doesn't help. Fortunato luigi (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Play Along Toys so that the content is preserved in accordance with our editing policy. The sources out there indicate that these toys did exist and were best sellers so there will be deeper coverage in the trade and collectible press which is not known to Google. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable doll. 72.150.245.110 (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete --Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Crystal Clear x3 07:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Play Along Toys, since both articles claim it was the first product the company ever released. liquidluck✽talk 01:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article includes one source and the links above indicate there's plenty more to choose from. --Pink Bull 06:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Play Along Toys and Britney Spears. It's worth having some coverage, but not an entire article. Note also that it is no longer an unreferenced list. There is content backed by references, just not enough to merit an entire article. PrincessofLlyr ^{royal court} 02:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, oppose merge The article has received sufficient coverage in reliable sources to pass Wikipedia:Notability and to stand on its own. I disagree with a merge to Play Along Toys because it would unnecessarily lengthen that article. My rewrite of the article on 18 May 2010 should rectify the concerns of the "delete" votes. Cunard (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.