Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Taekwondo Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British Taekwondo Council

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review Week February 18, 2010, User:Jmcw37 as secretary.
WP:NRVE "No reliable sources found to verify notability" jmcw (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —jmcw (talk) 18:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. -RobertMel (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This was discussed and we simply couldn't find the significant 3rd party coverage. It exists, but can't find the notability. As such, fails WP:ORG. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. -RobertMel (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Merge British Taekwondo Control Boardto Apologies I missed this one on the review; Sport England is the Quango responsible for sport and this appears to be one of their recognised orgs,(the only one for TKD) (links to club & sport funding stuff) It will also be responsible for helping sort out the UK Olympic TKD team. --Nate ^t/_c 13:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I admit I'm struggling to find sourcing other than affiliated clubs (or which there are lots) --Nate ^t/_c 13:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nate, maybe it would be better to merge/redirect this article into the article on British_Taekwondo_Control_Board who notability is established by the British Olympic Association [[1]? jmcw (talk) 13:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me it seems that they are mainly a face to avoid someone having to figger out which TKD org they whoudl seek to each time. --Nate ^t/_c 13:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've said redirect on a sizeable number of ones in the projects review, but this isn't one I can see changing my !vote on. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.