Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Columbia Rugby League Competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Deadbeef 01:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Rugby League Competition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced articles about a regional sports organization which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NRU - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Included in this discussion are the following articles

•Delete Neither the League nor the Teams appear notable. Article lack third party references. Even the vast majority of the fields in which these teams play in do not appear notable. --I eat BC Fish (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sport-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (Keep) — The Bayside Sharks article says it supplies international players. That meets the WP:RU notability criteria. Barryjjoyce (talk) 04:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.