Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Brazilians
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- British Brazilians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject itself is not notable and yet the article does not have important coverage. There is only a single source, which means that the article fails WP:GNG. --Vaco98 (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. --Vaco98 (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --Vaco98 (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. --Vaco98 (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: This appears to be an attempt at a "List of" but there is nothing to show by use of references that the concept of British Brazilians is of itself notable, thus fails WP:GNG and there is nothing that links each list member to being British and Brazilian. SO ot iOS a BLP problem too. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Pure WP:OR created by an indef. blocked editor. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 02:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Timtrent. Possibly a G5, but as this is already at a week it might as well be an AFD delete. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.