Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigitte Kwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brigitte Kwan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, created by an indef-blocked user, is likely a hoax. It's unsourced and I cannot find any information on the web about a feminist named Brigitte Kwan or 関秀華 (her purported Chinese name), except for Wikipedia-derived content. Zanhe (talk) 23:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Total lack of any sources. I looked through the listed sources and they do not speak of Kwan. Let alone support the paragraphs of text in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not sure about actual notability, but the person probably existed, see [1] (in Chinese). Timmyshin (talk) 22:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but that's a blog post which claims Kwan was the grandmother of an actor. I haven't been able to find any RS about Kwan herself. -Zanhe (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd agree to Delete. Timmyshin (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only source I could find here is a blog post and it doesn't qualify for WP:RS. Kagundu^{Wanna Chat?} 22:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.