Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brightech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brightech[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability. Written like an advertisement. References in article seem to all be ads, paid reviews, or affiliate blogs. Colin M (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Above. I also have an observation which i will reveal to deleting admin. Lapablo (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as likely undisclosed paid advocacy/covert advertising. I've blocked the creator for that reason. MER-C 18:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.