Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Desert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bright Desert

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional location in Greyhawk, a D&D setting. No secondary sources cited, no evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Greyhawk. BOZ (talk) 21:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fictional location that fails WP:NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Very minor fictional location, with no reliable secondary sources, so it fails the WP:GNG. The name is also very generic, and there are a number of other things using the name/term, so using it as a Redirect would not be a good idea. Rorshacma (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge as above. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Where do you envision it in the target article? What do you envisage keeping? I would have no objection to you completing the merge right now. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article fails WP:GNG, is nothing but a plot description, and besides it having a generic name there is no redirect target that meets the notability threshold. Devonian Wombat (talk 05:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.