Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bride Service (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Timothy Asch films. content there if someone wants to merge StarM 03:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bride Service (film)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect to Tim Asch. Per WP:NF, "An article on the film should be created only if there is enough information on it that it would clutter up the biography page of that person if it was mentioned there." A google serach reveals very little (if anything) that might form the basis of a seperate article. PC78 (talk) 15:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to new article List of Timothy Asch films with respects to the nom, per WP:NF, film is notable per being used in the anthropolgy courses around the world and being in a national archive (Smithsonian). Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 16:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We know the film exists, that isn't the issue. As I read the guideline, if that is all there is to be said about it, then it can be adequately said in Tim Asch and there shouldn't be a stand alone article. Could be wrong, though. PC78 (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - There is curently a looooong "list" in the Asch article, but since so many of these films have 1) won national and international recognition, 2) are used in Anthropology courses at major universities, and 3) are in National Archives... these meet the criteria under WP:NF for their own article... stub or no. A seperate expanded listing to include all the above mentioned informations might best serve if this individual article is not kept as a stub. Though a merge of this one "would not clutter" the fimmaker's page, 24 such certainly would. Interesting situation. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update I have created the article List of Timothy Asch films borrowing the barren list from Timothy Asch and expanding upon it to include all coments and sources of the many stub articles about his films. If consensus decides these stubs should go, their information is now in one place and the list at the Asch article can go as well. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The nom agrees that a merge might best be in order. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.