Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bribie Island Coaches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to TransLink (South East Queensland). Shimeru 16:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bribie Island Coaches[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notability d'oh! _talk 13:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Including the above articles for the same reason. d'oh! _talk 13:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.
Comment. These are all bus companies in Australia. Some of these (e.g. Surfside Buslines) would appear to be much more informative than others. I have no real opinion on whether these are individually notable, but if commuter train stations are usually notable, I'm not sure that bus lines and routes would not be. My preference would be to smerge and redirect these into larger aggregations like TransLink (South East Queensland) or Transit Australia Group, but it isn't a particularly strong one. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, merging into TransLink is better in this case. Also the information in all of these articles is original research, which still not makes them notable. Most train stations are not notable, but that is another discussion. d'oh! _talk 01:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with TransLink (South East Queensland) or Transit Australia Group. Non-notable. Bleakcomb (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge - no indication that they are notable. Codf1977 (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Unsourced stub articles with no indication of notability. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.