Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Gardner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brianna Gardner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NOTNEWS, in that there is no detail to the biography or assertion of notability outside of reporting of their death; a look for sources from the usual channels produced no better sources. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep - seem to have gotten considerable press for her tv appearance. her murder also got coverage.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS. If the decision is keep, move to Murder of Brianna Gardner, since she only rose to prominence after her death. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article creator is developing a worrying track record of non-notable biographies. St Anselm (talk) 04:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per WP:MURDEROF, tragic but not notable. Vrac (talk) 00:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above & NOTNEWS - Whilst it's sad someone dying, we don't have articles on every single person in the world who's died. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 02:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The whole thing is heartbreaking (especially the comment the judge made, given what later happened to her) but unfortunately this murder didn't get enough coverage to warrant Gardener having an article. Other than a brief spate of coverage when her body was discovered, Gardener didn't gain any additional coverage after that point - no follow up stories, no coverage on ID, or anything that would potentially help provide notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.