Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Frost Hogan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy so MQS can continue to work on it Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link User:MichaelQSchmidt/Brianna Frost Hogan

Brianna Frost Hogan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is on a subject (person), whose notability hasn't been established. Ted87 (talk) 02:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on grounds of non-notability. Also looks like an ad "She is a "webcam model" who spends her days stripping for paying customers. "--Bobbyd2011 (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC) confirmed sockpuppet -- œ ^™ 16:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article does not seem to make a very compelling case for notability here. OSborn^arf_contribs. 05:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment Much of the content would require removal under WP:BLP as unsourced. Though currently in a sorry state, if more sources like Philadelphia Daily News can be found and used, and the article edited to remove the sense of advert, the subject "might" show a meeting of WP:GNG and a pushing at WP:ENT. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.