Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Woulfe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Woulfe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Coverage is mostly PR, interviews and WP:SPS sources. scope_creep^Talk 21:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ireland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Possibly speedy delete as overtly promotional. The COI account that created this removed the COI template, of course. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTLINKEDIN, professional profile with substantial NPOV issues. —siro χ o 03:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:DEL-REASON #4. Primary purpose of this article looks to be advertisement. Graywalls (talk) 08:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I removed the COI tag after a vandalizing IP editor inserted it. See the article's editing history.Showmesicily (talk) 19:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your edit history speaks more clearly than your accusations, Showmesicily. Other editors can see the quality of the content you've added to Wiki, and that you have not answered legitimate concerns about WP:COI, instead removing maintenance templates while accusing others of vandalism, now for the third time. If you believe you've been targeted by vandals, please open a report at AIV or ANI, and allow administrators to weigh in. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very clearly promotional in nature, notability still not shown. Please don't call all editors vandals. — Karnataka ^talk 21:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.