Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Mulvey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Mulvey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor lacking non-trivial, in-depth sourcing. Verges on advert. Claim to fame is a minor part in a film. Article appears to be push by COI to get him "noticed." reddogsix (talk) 13:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotionally-toned blurb for an actor. My searches reveal he's had minor parts in a few movies but nothing which suggests he meets the criteria in WP:NACTOR. I can find no evidence he's notable for any other reason. Neiltonks (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Neiltonks - very promotional in tone and fails notability standards. Patient Zero^talk 09:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: easily fails WP:NACTOR. ww2censor (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - he had three teeny tiny roles, all of which were single-named. Do I really have to analyze that statement? Bearian (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.