Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian J.G. Pereira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Kimchi.sg 01:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brian J.G. Pereira[edit]

Not sure how to handle this one (or the redirect Dr. Brian J.G. Pereira). Questionable notability and article appears to be largely lifted from this website: [1]. Medtopic 05:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems to meet notability guidelines for academics, eg PubMed gives 172 citations for "Pereira BJ" which seem (from a quick scan) to be him. Does need considerable tidying up though. Espresso Addict 07:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article should be taken to copyright problems. If it isn't, delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 07:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. Not sure about the Copyvio, it seems a summary of his bio rather than a copy-and-paste act. ~ trialsanderrors 17:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 13:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite Seems adequately notable but it's not an article right now. Dlyons493 Talk 13:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Espresso Addict. --Gurubrahma 06:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Espresso Addict. ImpuMozhi 01:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep please it is adequately notable Yuckfoo 06:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.